A couple of months ago I was told by my French dentist that I would need to have all of my upper teeth out and most of my lower ones due to bone loss caused by gum disease. My front teeth are particularly bad and wonky. Some of my other upper teeth are fine but he said all of my teeth would have to come out due to my having a significant overbite which would make it difficult to fit partial dentures. (this was confirmed by a specialist he sent me to)
Obviously a little upset I decided to visit a dentist in the UK to get a second opinion. He said he agreed I had problems but saw no reason why I should have to lose all my upper teeth just to replace my front ones. He suggested I could keep most of them but would need dentures to replace the front ones in the near future.
Prefering this option - I then decided to visit yet another dentist in France in the hope that he would confirm the English dentist's opinion. However, he threw things completely in the air. He said with care I could keep all my teeth - at least for a few more years. He put me on anti-biotics (I have to say my teeth are a lot firmer since I finished them), took a mould of my teeth then, after studying them, said I needed crowns on all my lower molars (at a significant cost to myself, my insurance and the social security system), which would correct my overbite problem, then some sort of brace which would push my front teeth a little more in place.
I am of course going to take this option as it offer the best outcome at least in the short term. But I ask you why such a divergence of opinion?? I am interested in the experiences of the others. Thanks for reading this - if you are still awake at this stage.![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Thanks
